Comparison
Maquete vs Veras
Both are AI rendering tools built for architects, but they make opposite engineering decisions. Veras leans into creative reinterpretation. Maquete is engineered for geometric fidelity. Here is when each fits.
Overview
Veras (by EvolveLAB) is an AI rendering plugin for SketchUp, Revit, and Rhino. It uses generative diffusion to produce photorealistic images from a 3D viewport, with prompt-driven creative control over style and atmosphere.
Maquete is an AI rendering platform with a native SketchUp plugin and direct image upload from Archicad, Revit, Rhino, and Blender. The product is engineered around one principle: never reinterpret your design. Walls, openings, proportions, and structural elements are preserved exactly as modelled. Architects don't write prompts and don't pick models — specialised architectural prompts are pre-tuned and the best image model is selected automatically.
The choice depends on your workflow. If you want the AI to help you explore creative variations of a space, Veras is built for that. If you want a faithful render of the design you have already finalised — for client presentations, competition entries, or production marketing — Maquete is built for that.
Feature comparison
| Feature | Maquete | Veras |
|---|---|---|
| Geometry preservation | Engineered for fidelity — never reinterprets | Creative reinterpretation common |
| SketchUp integration | Native plugin — one-click viewport render | Plugin for SketchUp, Revit, Rhino |
| Render time | ~30 seconds per 4K render | 30-60 seconds typical |
| Pricing (entry) | Free tier; paid from $19/mo | From ~$25/mo (Veras Standard) |
| Prompt requirement | None — specialised architectural prompts pre-tuned by us | Heavy — output quality depends on prompt skill |
| AI model selection | Automatic — best-in-class image model picked per scene | Diffusion model under the hood, exposed via prompt-driven controls |
| Material specificity | Name materials directly (e.g. Portobello tile) | Inferred from prompt |
| Lighting presets | 15+ named presets (golden hour, blue hour, etc.) | Prompt-controlled |
| BIM/CAD breadth | SketchUp plugin + image upload from any tool | Native plugins for Revit + Rhino |
| Best for | Architects who need predictable, faithful output | Designers exploring creative options |
When to choose which
Choose Maquete when fidelity matters
Client deliverables, competition entries, marketing materials — anywhere the render needs to faithfully represent the design you have signed off. Maquete will never add furniture you didn't model or shift a wall to make a composition look better.
Choose Veras when you want creative exploration
Early concept work, mood-finding, alternative material studies — when you want the AI to suggest interpretations of your space. Veras leans into reinterpretation as a feature, not a bug.
Workflow integration
Veras has native plugins for Revit and Rhino, which Maquete doesn't (yet). If you're a Revit-first studio that wants a one-click in-app render, Veras has the tighter integration. Maquete accepts Revit exports as image uploads.
Lower price point
Both tools start free. Maquete paid plans begin at $19/mo — below Veras (~$25/mo). The deciding factor is product behaviour, but Maquete edges Veras on cost.
Choose Maquete if you don't want to write prompts
Architects demand precision but shouldn't have to faff with prompts and model selection to get it. Maquete does the work for you — specialised architectural prompts are pre-tuned in the background, and the best image model is selected automatically per scene. You paste the image and go. Veras output quality depends on how skilled you are at writing the prompt.
Frequently asked questions
Is Maquete a Veras alternative?+
Yes — both are AI rendering tools for architects. The key difference is engineering philosophy. Veras prioritises creative reinterpretation; Maquete prioritises geometric fidelity. If you've been frustrated by Veras adding furniture you didn't model or altering your room layout, Maquete is built specifically to not do that.
Does Veras preserve geometry?+
Veras uses general diffusion models that often reinterpret 3D viewports — adding details, shifting elements, or altering proportions to produce a more visually pleasing result. This is great for ideation; less great for client-facing deliverables. Maquete's prompts are engineered to preserve your geometry exactly.
Which has better SketchUp support?+
Both ship native SketchUp plugins that render from the active viewport. Functional parity here. Maquete's plugin returns to your viewport faster (~30s); Veras typically lands in similar time depending on model load.
Can I use both together?+
Yes, and many architects do. Use Veras early in the design process when you want the AI to suggest variations. Use Maquete later, once you've finalised geometry, when you need a faithful render for the client. They're complementary tools at different points in the workflow.
How does pricing compare?+
Within ~15% of each other across comparable tiers. Both offer free entry plans and paid tiers in the $49-99/mo range. Choose based on product behaviour — fidelity (Maquete) vs. interpretive flexibility (Veras) — not price.
Render the design you actually drew.
Free 7-day trial. No prompt engineering. Your geometry, preserved exactly.
Start free trial →